Bioethics

Legal issues behind embryonic stem cell research

Under the proposed Canadian legislation governing assisted human reproduction, a person may be permitted to engage in the following activities provided he or she possesses a licence to do so under the authority of the minister of Health, and provided that he or she has obtained the necessary legally valid informed consent of the relevant person(s). To create an embryo. To create [...]

2010-07-21T09:15:07-04:00November 21, 2001|Bioethics|

Ban human cloning

In recent months, the U.S. House of Representatives has banned all human cloning. So has Russia. France and Germany have called for an international ban on such practices. The United Kingdom, even though it allows the grisly practice of therapeutic cloning, banned reproductive human cloning last year. In fact, 23 countries have fully or partially banned human cloning. Yet Canada's Health Minister, [...]

2010-07-20T13:48:39-04:00November 20, 2001|Bioethics, Editorials|

Stem cells and paid surrogacy

Pro-life Canadians could be forgiven for thinking that a combination between the Liberal Party and the Communist Party of Canada had recently co-opted the Canadian Alliance. First, on August 28, the Globe and Mail reported that Alliance MP Keith Martin was advocating for-profit surrogacy. Three days later, former Alliance leader Preston Manning was quoted in the National Post supporting experimentation on human [...]

2010-07-20T09:26:05-04:00September 20, 2001|Bioethics|

The connection between ESCR and the Nazi doctors

What does the current debate over stem cells have to do with the concentration camps at places like Auschwitz and Dachau? More than you might think. When Allied troops liberated the few remaining prisoners of the Nazi concentration camps, they made some horrific discoveries. Among the records that survived of the gassings, burnings and shootings of millions of 'undesirables,' were graphic descriptions [...]

2010-07-20T08:34:28-04:00September 20, 2001|Bioethics|

The rhetoric of embryonic stem cell research

Ask the average person, "What do you think of embryonic stem cell research?" He may answer with certainty and a profound conviction that what he is saying is most obvious: "Look, anything that can cure Alzheimer's, Parkinson's or diabetes is incredibly good. Yes, I know that there's some controversy - you're not going to try to tell me those embryonic cells are [...]

2010-07-20T08:18:36-04:00September 20, 2001|Bioethics|

Manning supporting embryonic research

Former Reform Party leader Preston Manning abandoned his pro-life position with his endorsement of embryonic stem cell research (ESCR). Manning, science and technology critic for the Canadian Alliance was joined by Alliance health critic Diane Ablonczy in his annoucnement which also called for a ban on the creation of embryos for the purpose of research. Pro-lifers were disturbed that the critics urged [...]

2010-07-20T07:46:15-04:00September 20, 2001|Bioethics|

No compromise on stem cells

The reaction to President George W. Bush's announcement restricting US government funding of embryonic stem-cell research to 60 existing stem cell lines has been widely praised as a suitable compromise with representatives from both sides of the debate-for instance, the National Right to Life Committee and stem-cell research advocates Mary Tyler Moore and Michael J. Fox-congratulating the president on his decision. But [...]

2010-07-19T09:49:39-04:00August 19, 2001|Bioethics|

The ‘shining wires’ of bioethics: the desire for human perfection

The expression of deep ethical concerns by the prolife movement parallels the development of contemporary "bioethics." Those ethical concerns relate to the death-dealing "shining wires" and controls hidden in the undergrowth of human determination, not only to heal but to achieve the unlimited perfection of the human race. That determination is eugenic in nature. Darwin is noted to have written, "We civilized [...]

2010-07-19T08:32:37-04:00July 19, 2001|Bioethics|

President Bush agonizes over whether to fund embryo-destructive stem cell research

Must decide whether to keep a firm campaign promise to pro-life voters LifeSite NewsAs U.S. President George Bush is about to release his decision on the use and funding of the destructive use of human embryos for stem cell experimentation, advocates and opponents are competing to have their voices heard. Pro-life groups have presented a unified front against the killing of this [...]

2010-07-19T08:33:49-04:00July 19, 2001|Bioethics|

The United Nations’ International Bioethics Committee

Beyond the visible horizon line of the United Nations Conferences during the 1990s, a group of internationally-based scientists, high-powered attorneys and government-associated ethicists bid in a high stakes game for access to the human person for research. Their mission, loftily described as the "ethics of life," has been the scientific "transformation of human beings by human beings." This not-so-new-game is conducted within [...]

2010-07-19T09:14:22-04:00June 19, 2001|Bioethics|

Research paper will guide Ottawa on stem cells

Does not acknowledge that embryonic stem cells are unnecessary for medical progress In their recent paper on stem cell research, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research acknowledges the existence of non-controversial sources of stem cells, including adult tissues, but maintains that they are not as useful as embryonic cells, which are derived from "left-over" embryos created through in vitro fertilization: "Recent evidence [...]

2010-07-19T09:03:42-04:00June 19, 2001|Bioethics|

Procreation for spare parts

A Canadian moral theologian criticizes the use of new productive technologies when they leads to the objectification of people. Bridget Campion, assistant professor of moral theology at St. Augustine's Seminary in Toronto, told The Interim that recent uses of in vitro fertilization (IVF) have created a whole new moral problem that goes beyond how human life is created to the uses to [...]

2010-07-28T09:18:03-04:00November 28, 2000|Abortion, Bioethics, Fetal Rights, Pro-Life|

Clinton lifts ban on funding stem cell research

Britain, meanwhile, is poised to allow cloning of humans By Paul Tuns U.S. President Bill Clinton issued an executive order August 23 reversing a prohibition on the federal funding of research performed on human embryos, a sure boon to those that see a promise of cures for various diseases in the deaths of the tiniest unborn children. In the last few years, [...]

2010-07-27T13:39:18-04:00September 27, 2000|Bioethics, Fetal Rights|

International Digest

Californians reject gay marriage California voters have said an emphatic "no" to the question of same-sex marriage. Results of the state's direct democracy plebiscite indicate that voters have turned thumbs down to a proposal that would give official sanction to homosexual unions. The plebiscite, which contained 31 propositions, asked for a yes or no vote to the proposal: "Only a marriage between [...]

2010-07-14T13:15:14-04:00April 14, 2000|Bioethics, Marriage and Family|

Gene patents key step toward the fabrication of man

By Winifride Prestwich The Interim A National Post article, "Patent office challenged over human cloning" (Feb. 22, 2000), mentions a United States Supreme Court ruling almost twenty years ago which gave "the green light" to patents on "living things." The article refers to the Court's ruling in Diamond vs. Chakrabarty, June 16, 1980. Briefly stated, these are the facts. (1) Amanda Chakrabarty, a microbiologist [...]

2010-07-14T10:46:27-04:00April 14, 2000|Bioethics|
Go to Top